Zoning Board Of Appeal Hearing

March 4, 2025

Case: BOA- 1359819 Address: 21 Capen Street Ward 17 Applicant: Jeanette Reynosa

Case: BOA-1255410 Address: 19 Bennington Street Ward 1 Applicant: Michael Ford

Case: BOA-1426452 Address: 68 Terrace Street Ward 10 Applicant: Michael P. Ross, ESQ

Case: BOA- 1419403 Address: 5 Nancia Street Ward 1 Applicant: Derric Small, ESQ

Case: BOA-1419403 Address: 127 Saint Andrew Road Ward 1 Applicant: Derric Small, ESQ

Case: BOA- 768729 Address: 79-89 West Broadway Ward 6 Applicant: Derric Small, ESQ

Case: BOA- 1434919 Address: 122 Saratoga Street Ward 1 Applicant: Richard Lynds, ESQ

Case: BOA- 1383661 Address: 329-329A Columbus Avenue Ward 4 Applicant: Michael P. Ross, ESQ

Case: BOA- 1332592 Address: 19 Woodville Street Ward 8 Applicant: Mark McCreath

Case: BOA- 818377 Address: 111 Terrace Street Ward 10 Applicant: Michael P. Ross, ESQ

Case: BOA- 667111 Address: 151 Liverpool Street Ward 1 Applicant: City Point Liverpool, LLC

Case: BOA- 1279801 Address: 120 Braintree Street Ward 22 Applicant: Nicholas Zozula, ESQ

Case: BOA- 1566439 Address: 761-793 Boylston Street Ward 5 Applicant: Rebecca Lee

Case: BOA- 1310507 Address: 29 Hamilton Street Ward 15 Applicant: 25-33 Hamilton GP LLY (by Sarah Wegman, ESQ)

Case: BOA- 1691234 Address: 9 Oak Square Avenue Ward 22 Applicant: George Morancy, ESQ

Article(s) Art. 09 Sec. 02 Nonconforming Use Change Change in a nonconforming use >25% -Forbidden

Art. 51 Sec. 08 Use Regulations MFR use- Forbidden Art. 51 Sec. 08 Use Regulations Basement unit forbidden Art. 51 Sec. 09 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient front yard setback Art. 51 Sec. 09 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient side yard setback

Purpose: Renovate and extend existing 4-unit dwelling building and change legal occupancy to 6 dwelling units, with 6 standard accessory off-street parking spaces at grade plus one van-accessible ADA space

Case: BOA- 1690509 Address: 23-25 N Beacon Street Ward 22 Applicant: Nora LLC-ARTICLE 80

Article(s) Article 51, Section 8 Use: ForbiddenMulti Family Dwelling Forbidden Article 51 Section 9.4Dim Reg: Location of Main Entrance Units 101 & 102 Article 51, Section 9 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient Article 51, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 51, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 51, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 51, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 51, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 51, Section 57.2 Conformity Exist Bldg Alignment Article 51, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient

Purpose: ERECT A SIX (6) STORY MULTI FAMILY BUILDING WITH TWENTY FIVE (25) DWELLING UNITS. THE GROUND FLOOR WILL CONTAIN A RESIDENTIAL LOBBY WITH OPEN WORK AREA AND MAIL ROOM, BIKE STORAGE ROOM, TRASH AND UTILITY SPACES AND TWO (2) DWELLING UNITS WITH PRIVATE EXTERIOR SIDE ENTRIES. THE PROJECT WILL INCLUDE ZERO (0) PARKING SPACES, AN OFF STREET VEHICLE TURNAROUND AREA (LOADING) AND THIRTY (30) SECURE AND VISITOR BIKE PARKING SPACES. DEMOLISH AN EXISTING THREE (3) STORY MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ON SEPARATE PERMIT.



Case: BOA- 1691967 Address: 434 Washington Street Ward 22 Applicant: Peninsula Capital Group LLC-ARTICLE 80

Article(s) Article 51 Section 17 Dimensional Regulations Max. f.a.r. allowed has been exceeded Article 51 Section 17 Dimensional RegulationsMax allowed building height has been exceeded Article 51 Section 17Dimensional Regulations Insufficient open space/ dwelling unit Article 51 Section 17 Dimensional RegulationsInsufficient side yard setback where the parcel abuts a residential sub district Article 51 Section 17 Dimensional RegulationsInsufficient rear yard setback ARTICLE 51 ALLSTON BRIGHTONSection 52.1 Street Wall Continuity; street Modal NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT Alignment not met (i.e. Insufficient front yard setback) Art.51 Sec.53Screening & Buffering Req None proposed Art.51 Sec.56 Off St Parking DesignDesign/ free Maneuvering areas (Automated parking

conveyor/stacker system) Article 51, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient

Purpose: To erect a four story mixed use structure with eighteen dwelling units and one ground floor retail space, and an enclosed garage with eleven off street parking spaces in a semi automated stacker system.

Case: BOA- 1677709 Address: 50 Bradeen Street Ward 19 Applicant: John Walsh

Article(s) Article 67 Section 32 Off-Street Parking & Loading Req Insufficient parking per # of units

Article 67 Section 33 Application of Dimensional Req Insufficient rear yard setback of shallow lot -32' required Article 67, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient 4,000sf min required Article 67, Section 9 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient 2,000sf/unit required Article 67, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive .8 max Article 67, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient 800sf/unit required Article 67, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient 10' required

Purpose: Construct three family dwelling at 50 Bradeen Street

Case: BOA- 1654474 Address: 36-38 Wyvern Street Ward 19 Applicant: Andry Rezende

Article(s) Article 55, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 55, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient

Article 55, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories)

Purpose: Finish attic and add master bedroom, full bathroom and utility closet. Frame 2 new dormers

Case: BOA-1659168 Address: 312 Talbot Avenue Ward 17 Applicant: DeFarias Investments LLC

Article(s) Article 65 Section 7 Establishment of Res SubdistrictsApplicant will need to seek relief for the use of a FOUR

Family to be located in a Three family zone. Art. 65 Sec. 08 ForbiddenApplicant will need to seek relief for the proposed

basement unit of the proposed Four family. Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area InsufficientThe applicant will need to seek relief for the lot area being insufficient 4474 SF, not the required 6000 SF.Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient The applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient lot width, required to be 50' (feet).Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio ExcessiveThe applicant will need to seek relief for an excessive Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of 1.07, required to have 0.4.Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories)The applicant will need to seek relief for excessive story height of 3, required to have 2.5 stories.Article 65, Section 9 Front Yard InsufficientThe applicant will need to seek relief for the required front yard set back of 15' (feet). Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient The applicant will need to seek relief for the required side yard setback of 10' (feet). Article 65, Section 39Screening & Buffering Req The applicant will need to seek relief for screening & buffering of the proposed parking via an easement for 29 Southern AVE.Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirementsThe applicant will need to seek relief for the required number of parking spaces. The submitted plan shows only two spaces not the required five as required for

312 Talbot AVE. The applicant will need to file for an ALTERATION PERMIT for the proposed easement for parking of four vehicles at 29 Southern AVE.

Purpose: Construction of new four family residential building.

Case: BOA- 1690119 Address: 11 Capen Street Ward 17 Applicant: Welcome Home, Boston Phase II-Capen/Norfolk-MOH

Article(s) Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden MFR use Forbidden Art. 65 Sec. 41Off street parking requirements Insufficient parking Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient Article 65, Section 9Dimensional Regulations Number of allowed stories has been exceeded

Purpose: MOH New 3 story residential building containing 6 dwelling units with shared parking on site (6) spaces. This

Building C is associated with ERT 1653827 (270 Norfolk St) and ERT 1653828 (262 Norfolk St). This project is an

MOH Welcome Home Boston project.



Case: BOA- 1690082 Address: 270 Norfolk Street Ward 17 Applicant: Welcome Home, Boston Phase II-Capen/Norfolk-MOH

Article(s) Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden MFR use forbidden Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional RegulationsInsufficient lot size Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional RegulationsInsufficient lot width 50' req. Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s Insufficient lot width frontage 50' req. Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Excessive f.a.r.

Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional RegulationsNumber of allowed stories has been exceeded Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient front yard setback Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional RegulationsInsufficient side yard setback Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient rear yard setback Article 65, Section 41 Off Street Parking & Loading Req Insufficient parking Article 65, Section 41 Off Street Parking RegulationsInsufficient clear access and maneuvering areas on own lot. (note: Access via 11 capen street with no easment or right of way shown on Stamped land survey.)

Purpose: MOH New 3 story residential building with 6 dwelling units with shared parking onsite. This building A is associated with ERT for 262 Norfolk Street and ERT for 11 Capen Street. This permit application is part of the MOH Welcome Home Boston project.

Case: BOA- 1690111 Address: 262 Norfolk Street Ward 17 Applicant: Welcome Home, Boston Phase II-Capen/Norfolk-MOH

Article(s) Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirements Insufficient parking Art. 65 Sec. 41Off street parking requirements Design: Access and maneuvering areas on own lot Article 65, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient

Article 65, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations # of allowed stories exceeded

Purpose: MOH New 3 story residential building containing 2 dwelling units with shared parking on site (6) parking spaces. This building B is associated with ERT 1653827 (270 Norfolk St) and ERT for 11 Capen St. This project is an MOH Welcome Home Boston project.

Case: BOA-1631598 Address: 32 Dewey Street Ward 13 Applicant: Vernon Woodworth

Article(s) Article 50, Section 29 Lot Area Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Lot Width Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 50, Section 29 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 50, Section 29Front Yard Insufficient

Article 50, Section 29 Side Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 43 Off Street Parking & Loading ReqOff street parking is insufficient 3 spaces are required and

only 2 are provided

Purpose : New 3 family. Nominal fee requested pending ZBA approval.

Case: BOA- 1631601 Address: 34 Dewey Street Ward 13 Applicant: Vernon Woodworth

Article(s) Article 50, Section 29 Lot Area Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Lot Width Insufficient

Article 50, Section 29 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 50, Section 29 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Front Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Side Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 43Off Street Parking & Loading Req Off street parking is insufficient. 2 spaces are required and none are provided

Purpose: New 2 family. Nominal fee requested pending ZBA approval.



Case: BOA- 1644751 Address: 5 Lark Street Ward 7 Applicant: Timothy Burke

Article(s) Art 68 Sec 29 Roof Structure Restrictions Max pre-existing allowed height on parcel exceeded-Two stories existing Art 68 Sec 8 Dim reg app in res sub dist Insufficient lot size -2000sf min. req Art 68 Sec 8 Dim reg app in res sub dist Insufficient additional lot area per unit - 1000sf/unit req. Art 68 Sec 8 Dim reg app in res sub dist Excessive f.a.r. -2.0 max allowed Art 68 Sec 8 Dim reg app in res sub dist Insufficient open space- 200sf/dwelling unit req. Art. 68 Sec. 33 Off Street parking Req. Design: Location, design and clear maneuvering areas Art.68 Sec. 34 Appl. of Dim. Reqs. Insufficient rear yard setback on shallow lot -15' min setback req. (2.5.25 revised BOA set reviewed) Article 68, Section 33 Off-Street Parking & Loading Req Insufficient minimum access drive width- 10' req. Article 68, Section 33 Off-Street Parking & Loading Req insufficient parking

Purpose: 2.5.25 SCOPE OF WORK MODIFIED AT BOA: Demolish an existing house and construct a new four story building with three dwelling units as shown on the drawings with three off street parking spaces with zero setback with roof deck removed from project.

Case: BOA- 1688563 Address: 15 Cawfield Street Ward 7 Applicant: Vazberg Properties

Article(s) Article 65, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 65, Section 9 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient Art. 65 Sec. 60 37Off Street parking insufficient

Purpose: To erect a three story rear addition to the existing three family dwelling

Case: BOA- 1692919 Address: 36-42 West Broadway Ward 6 Applicant: 32-42 West Broadway Realty Trust

Article(s) Article 68, Section 7 Use Regulations·Proposed light manufacturing use on the 2nd floor is forbidden under Article 68, Section 7, Table A.·Proposed professional office space on the 3rd floor is forbidden under Article 68, Section 7, Table A. Per footnote 1, professional office space is only permitted on the ground floor or in a basement with a separate entrance.

Purpose: Confirm occupancy of light manufacture on second floor .36 West Broadway, 3rd floor, current use Yoga Studio, proposed use professional Office.

Case: BOA- 1694094 Address: 457-469A West Broadway Ward 6 Applicant: Sean George

Article(s) Art.68 Sec.13 Use Regs.Restaurant with take out use is conditional

Purpose: Full Interior Fit out of 457 469A West Broadway to build out a Anna's Taqueria (Restaurant) With Takeout. Space is currently vacant and the Use is conditional so ZBA is required. Operating Hours 10AM 10PM (7 days) No Alcohol.

Case: BOA-1689340 Address: 230 Marlborough Street Ward 5 Applicant: Austin Roberts Construction

Article(s) Article 13, Section 1 Rear Yard Insufficient

Purpose : Construct a roof deck with wood framed masonry walls on top of existing Garden Level roof structure. Replace existing window with door for roof deck access.

Case: BOA-1556711 Address: 138 Arlington Street Ward 5 Applicant: Lawrence DiCara

Article(s)Art. 32 Sec. 32 4Groundwater Conservation Overlay District, Applicability Art. 25 Sec. 5Flood Hazard Districts Art. 63, Section 8 Dimensional RegulationsFront door shall face the front lot line. Art. 63, Section 8 Dimensional RegulationsLot width minimum required: 15' Proposed: 14.6' for Melrose St. Art. 63, Section 8 Dimensional RegulationsLot frontage minimum required: 15' Proposed: 14.6' for Melrose St. Article 63, Section 8 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Max. allowed: 2 Proposed: 4.05Article 63, Section 8 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Max. allowed: 3 Proposed: 4 Article 63, Section 8 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet)Max. allowed: 35' Proposed: 40' Article 63, Section 8 Usable Open Space InsufficientMin. required: 150 sqft Proposed: 40 sqft (roof deck) Article 63, Section 8 Rear Yard Insufficient Min. required: 12' Proposed: 0' Art. 63, Section 25Applications of dimensional requirements 63.25.2 Traffic visibility across corner lot.

Purpose : Permit to erect one family home. Separate demolition permit to be filed to demo existing structure



Case: BOA-1674746 Address: 33-41 West Street Ward 3 Applicant: ETR 33 West LLC

Article(s) Article 38, Section 18 Use RegulationsEscape room/Puzzle room use forbidden

Purpose: Change occupancy to include "escape room" on the second and third floors per plans.

Case: BOA- 1656048 Address: 255 Webster Street Ward 1 Applicant: Steven Leaf

Article(s) ARTICLE 53; SECTION 53 5Dimensional Regulations (Table F) Minimum Side Yard

Purpose: building a dormer at the front side of the house to extend living space

Case: BOA- 1640127 Address: 517-519 Metropolitan Avenue Ward 19 Applicant: Matthew Mueller

Article(s) Art. 69 Sec. 29.4 Off-St.Prk'g:Location parking spaces located on the side shall be separated 5 feet from the side lot line.Art. 69 Sec. 30.1 Bldg.Alignmnt Conformity Street modal calculation not provided to verify its compliance. Art. 69 Sec. 9 Location of Main Entrance Entrances shall face front lot line Article 69 Section 29 Off-Street Parking & Loading Req Insufficient parking spaces. Required: 12 Proposed: 11 Article 69, Section 8 Use: Forbidden Multifamily use Article 69, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Max. allowed: 0.5 Proposed: .77Article 69, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Max. allowed: 2.5 Proposed: 3 Article 69, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Min. required: 10,800 sqft Article 69, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Min. required: 25' Proposed: 15' Article 69, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Min. required: 40' Proposed: 19'

Purpose: Demolish existing home and build 6 Unit townhouse development with 6 garage parking spaces and

5 on-grade parking spaces.

Case: BOA-1685237 Address: 25 Denton TE Ward 18 Applicant:Alex Domenighini & Julia Martiz

Article(s) Article 67, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 67, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient

Purpose: Construct a full-length dormer addition to the existing attic of a detached 1-family home. Scope includes renovating the existing finished attic into a master suite and adding a reconstructed stair to the attic from the second floor. No work on the lower floor or change to the building footprint.

Case: BOA-1674858 Address: 9 Perrin Street Ward 12 Applicant: Eric Zachrison

Article(s) Art. 50 Sec. 29^ Lot Area Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient lot area. Art. 50 Sec. 38 Design Review Applicant will need to seek relief from Neighborhood Design Overlay District. Article 50, Section 29 Lot Width Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient lot width. Article 50, Section 29 Lot Frontage Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient lot frontage. Article 50, Section 29 Usable Open Space Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient usable open space.Article 50, Section 29 Side Yard Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient side yard setback. Article 50, Section 29 Rear Yard Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient rear yard setback. Article 50, Section 44.13 Two or More Dwellings on Same Lot Applicant will need to seek relief for two dwelling on the same lot.

Purpose: Confirm occupancy as existing carriage house and change occupancy to a 2 family. Subdivide lot into 2 lots and renovate as per plans. Nominal Fee requested.

Case: BOA- 1674857 Address: 93 Moreland Street Ward 12 Applicant:Eric Zachrison

Article(s): Art. 50, Section 28 Use: Conditional Applicant will need to seek relief for change of use from a single family to a four family . The use of a four family is conditional. Article 50, Section 29 Side Yard Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient side yard setbacks. Article 50, Section 29 Rear Yard Insufficient Applicant will need to seek relief for insufficient rear yard setback. Article 50, Section 44.13 Two or More Dwellings on Same Lot Applicant will need to seek relief for two dwellings units on the same lot (9 Perrin ST).

Purpose: Confirm occupancy as a single family and change to a 4 family. Subdivide lot into 2 lots and renovate as per plans. Nominal fee requested.

 

Case: BOA- 1564330 Address: 296 Summit Avenue Ward 21 Applicant: Rod Rivera

Article(s) Art. 51 Sec. 08 Use RegulationsProposed Main use Forbidden Art. 51 Sec. 08 Use RegulationsProposed accessory use parking forbidden Art. 51 Sec. 09Dimensional Regulations Insufficient rear yard setback

Art. 51 Sec. 09-Dimensional RegulationsNumber of allowed habitable stories has been exceeded Art. 51 Sec. 09 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient usable open space per unit Art. 51 Sec. 40 5(a)Off street parking design Clear maneuvering areas Art. 10 Sec. 01 Limitation of parking areas 5' side yard buffer Art. 51 Sec. 09Dimensional Regulations Insufficient additional lot area per unit Art. 51 Sec. 09 Dimensional RegulationsExcessive f.a.r.

Purpose : Change Occupancy from a 3 family to a 4 family. Make the Basement into a unit. work to include F/A, Sprinkler, MEP, framing and carpentry PROPOSE 10 9x20 PARKING SPACES IN SIDE AND REAR YARD.

Case: BOA-1685352 Address: 4471 Washington Street Ward 20 Applicant: Jon Wardwell

Article(s) Art. 67 Sec. 08 Use Regulations Applicable in MFR use - Forbidden Residential Sub Districts Article 67, Section 32 Off-Street Parking Insufficient parking Article 67, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient lot area -8000sf req.Article 67, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Max allowed F.A.R. exceeded Article 67, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Max number of stories allowed has been exceeded Article 67, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient usable open space per unit Article 67, Section 9 Dimensional Regulations Insufficient rear yard setback

Purpose : To erect a new residential building with 8 units and 4 parking spaces

Case: BOA- 1631614 Address: 679 Cummins Highway Ward 18 Applicant: Jose Valdez

Article(s) Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in Building lot allowed coverage exceeded- Residential Subdistricts (Table D) 40% max Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in Permeable Area of Lot minimum insufficient- 25% Residential Subdistricts (Table D) req.Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in Insufficient side yard setbacks -3' min ,14' cumulative Residential Subdistricts (Table D) Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in Insufficient rear yard setback -20' min req. Residential Subdistricts (Table D) Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in *-#677 Cummins Lot coverage exceeded due to Residential Subdistricts (Table D) reduction of lot size Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in *-#677 Cummins insufficient permeable lot area Residential Subdistricts (Table D) due to reduction of lot size Article 60 Section 60-4 - Dim. Regs Applicable in *-#677 Cummins Insufficient side yard setback Residential Subdistricts (Table D) due to reduction of lots proposed side lot line Location Article 60, Section 60-32 - Off-Street Parking and Loading *#677 Insufficient parking Requirements Article 60, Section 60-32 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Insufficient Parking -.75 spaces/ unit required Requirements

Article 60, Section 60-32 - Off-Street Parking and Loading LOCATION (4) No parking allowed in a required front yard unless if it is also a side yard to where frontage taken by the parking space does not exceed 10' in width -Article 60, Section 60-33 Special Dimensional Requirements 3) Insufficient front yard setback -10' setback req. For Corner Lots

Purpose : Subdivision of existing parcel and create w/ new parcel to have address of 679 Cummins Hwy. This application is for the Erection of new 3-family home with 2 off-street parking spaces & curb cut, basement storage and utilities. 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms per unit. Common interior and exterior stairs. Solar-ready.

Case: BOA-1630352 Address: 77 Bailey Street Ward 17 Applicant:77 Bailey Street LLC

Article(s) Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirements Art. 65 Sec. 65-41.5 Parking Size & Maneuverability Article 65, Section 42.13 Two or More Dwellings on Same Lot Article 65, Section 42.2 Conformity w Ex Bldg Alignment Article 65, Section 8 Use Regulations Multifamily Dwelling - Forbidden Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 65, Section Side Yard Insufficient

Purpose : Bldg 1 of 2. Erect a 4-Story (3 1/2 per Zoning) multifamily building with six (6) units. Building will have front & rear decks and rear parking spots. We are building two separate (6) unit buildings on the same lot; see ERT1609270 for second building at 79 Bailey St. Demolition of existing building to be filed under a separate permit.



Case: BOA- 1632750 Address: 79 Bailey Street Ward 17 Applicant: 77 Bailey Street LLC

Article(s) Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirements Art. 65 Sec. 65-41.5 Parking Size & Maneuverability

Art.65 Sec. 8 Use: Forbidden Multifamily Dwelling - Forbidden Article 65, Section 42.13 Two or More Dwellings on Same Lot Article 65, Section 42.2 Conformity w Ex Bldg Alignment Article 65, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient

Purpose : Bldg 2 of 2. Erect a 4-Story (3 1/2 per Zoning) multifamily building with six (6) units. Building will have front & rear decks and rear parking spots. We are building two separate (6) unit buildings on the same lot; see ERT1605980 for second building at 77 Bailey St. Demolition of existing building to be filed under a separate permit.

Case: BOA- 1658178 Address: 674-676 East Broadway Ward 6 Applicant: Joy Lee Real Estate Trust

Article(s) Article 68, Section 8 Lot Area Insufficient Article 68, Section 8 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient Article 68, Section 8 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 68, Section 8 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 68, Section 8 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 68, Section 8 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 68, Section 29 Roof Structure Restrictions Art. 68 Sec. 33 Off Street parking Req.

Purpose : Change of occupancy from a restaurant and one residential units to a restaurant and three residential units. Vertical addition by adding an additional floor, roof deck, and headhouse.

Case: BOA-1575584 Address: 81 Lexington Street Ward 1 Applicant: James Christopher

Article(s) Article 53 Section 28 Off Street Parking and Loading Parking Article 53 Section 29.1 Conformity with Existing Building Alignment Article 53 Section 29.2 Traffic Visibility Across Corner Article 53 Section 5.1 Use Regulations 7 Units – Forbidden Article 53 Section 5.3 Dimensional Regulations Building Height (Stories) Excessive Article 53 Section 5.3 Dimensional Regulations Building Height (Feet) Excessive Article 53 Section 5.3 Dimensional Regulations Building Width Excessive Article 53 Section 5.3 Dimensional Regulations Side Yard Insufficient

Purpose : Erect a 4-story (3-1/2 Zoning) multi-family dwelling on newly created lot; 3,706sqft. Building consisting 7 residential units. Scope includes bike storage and rear decks. See ALT1553019 for subdivision. Demolition of existing building on separate permit

Case: BOA-1578094 Address: 218 Bremen Street Ward 1 Applicant: Mohamad Hayek

Article(s): Art. 25 Sec. 5 Flood Hazard Districts Article 32, Section 4.GCOD, Applicability Art. 53, Section 8 Use: Forbidden MFR Forbidden Article 53, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 53, Section 9Side Yard Insufficient

Article 53, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 53, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 53, Section 9Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 53, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 53, Section 9 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient Article 53, Section 52Roof Structure Restrictions

Art. 53, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient

Purpose: Change of occupancy to 4 unit dwelling. Scope involves rear and vertical additions to create a 4 story building and add a 4th floor apartment with rear decks and front facing balcony at 4th story. New foundation is also included with upgrades to life safety (FA/FP).